|
|
|
|
| |
By Bob
Ingram | Published Date: November 14, 1956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPREME COURT OUTLAWS BUS SEGREGATION
Laws requiring racial segregation on buses in Montgomery and throughout
Alabama were declared unconstitutional yesterday in another historic
decision by the U. S. Supreme Court.
And while the decision dealt specifically with Alabama statutes
and ordinances of the City of Montgomery, in effect it also outlawed
similar segregation laws throughout the South since this ruling
sets the precedent for all similar cases in the future.
The ruling yesterday brought an immediate prediction from a Negro
leader here that a decision to end the 11-month bus boycott would
"unquestionably" be made at a mass meeting tonight.
Calling the decision a "glorious daybreak to end a long night
of enforced segregation," the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. declared
emphatically that his race would use "every legal means"
to see that the court's decision was complied with in Montgomery.
OMINOUS RUMBLING
But from white leaders of the city and state came warnings of possible
violence and blood shed if any attempt is made to carry out the
decision.
C. C. (Jack) Owen, president of the Alabama Public Service Commission,
declared that segregation must be maintained "to keep down
violence and bloodshed."
And Luther Ingalls, local leader of the pro-segregation Montgomery
Citizens' Council chapter, predicted flatly that "any attempt
to enforce this decision will inevitably lead to riot and bloodshed."
BOYCOTT RESULT
The court's decision yesterday stemmed directly from Montgomery's
long boycott. The tribunal, in a unanimous decision, upheld a June
19 decision of a special three-member panel of federal judges which
had ruled that Montgomery's bus segregation laws were unconstitutional.
Amid all the confusion as to the decision, one fact appeared to
stand clear - the court's decision had ended with abrupt finality
any legal efforts the city or state might initiate in an attempt
to preserve segregation on public conveyances. There is no appeal
from a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
The court order was not only unanimous, it was also brief. After
citing the 1954 school segregation case and also citing subsequent
decisions which outlawed segregation in public parks, playgrounds
and golf links, the court ruled briefly:
MOTION GRANTED
"The motion to affirm is granted and the judgement is affirmed."
This affirmation left no doubt that the Supreme Court was outlawing
segregation on all bus systems. Earlier this year some question
had arisen when the court simply dismissed an appeal from another
decision overturning a South Carolina segregation law. That left
the decision in effect but led to confusion - ended yesterday -
as to the Supreme Court's intent.
Meanwhile, what action the National City Lines, Inc., will take
locally became an issue of paramount importance. National City operates
the local buses.
Officials of the company in Chicago declined comment due to the
absence of the firm's president. Locally, no bus line official would
comment on what steps might be taken in view of the decision.
Also declining comment were members of the City Commission as well
as Gov. James E. Folsom.
Mayor W. A. Gayle, speaking for the commission, said he had not
seen a copy of the decision but would make an "appropriate
statement" after he has studied the court's ruling.
The court's decision yesterday placed into immediate effect an
injunction ordering the City Commission of Montgomery to cease enforcing
its segregation laws.
3 -JUDGE PANEL
This injunction was issued by the three-judge panel, but then held
in abeyance pending the outcome of the city's appeal. It was on
this appeal that the Supreme Court ruled yesterday.
There had been some question - and hope among white leaders - that
the injunction might still be in abeyance, but this was ruled out
by U. S. Circuit Judge Richard Rives, one of the panel members.
He said the injunction would go into effect as soon as the court
order reaches U. S. District Court in Montgomery. Rives said it
customarily takes two to three weeks for an order to reach the local
office.
Judge Rives also pointed out that the Supreme Court's decision
yesterday applied not only to Montgomery, but that it sets a precedent
for all similar cases of the future.
He noted that the City Commission and the Alabama Public Service
Commission have the right to petition for a rehearing within 15
days, but he said the possibility of further delay in the effective
date of the order was slight.
|